0.7.6 slower than 0.6.1
Ben Escoto
bescoto@stanford.edu
Fri, 14 Jun 2002 11:48:04 -0700
--==_Exmh_1518177607P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>>>>> "KS" == Kevin Spicer <Spicer>
>>>>> wrote the following on Fri, 14 Jun 2002 16:00:31 +0100
KS> Hi, I recently upgraded from 0.6.1 stable to 0.7.6 development,
KS> in the hopes it might help speed up my backup to a remote
KS> machine. 0.7.6 is taking much longer (13 hours rather than
KS> about 8 hours).
It's probably just that rdiff-backup has gotten more CPU hungry while
I've been adding features. How many files are there, about 500000? I
hope 0.9.x will see some speed enhancements.
KS> If I can't sort this out I may have to go back to 0.6.1 - is
KS> this likely to cause any problems?
I don't think so, but when you restore you'll have to use 0.7.x if
there were any compressed diff files, as 0.6.x won't recognize them.
--
Ben Escoto
--==_Exmh_1518177607P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 01/15/2001
iD8DBQE9Cjpj+owuOvknOnURAmU5AJ90fhycbN4RIjwmUsqdnDr9NezaoACcC/KI
cHAZgwV+B7DLDGpqdAhcBHc=
=WVId
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_1518177607P--